Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions

By R. Burns, J. DeForest, Juergen Marxsen, R. Sinsabaugh, M. Stromberger, M. Wallenstein, M. Weintraub, A. Zoppini. 2013

2,184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb0581533595b173086dc9191877c2cbbf712d8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Linkages between extracellular enzyme activities and the carbon and nitrogen content of grassland soils (2016, background): “For example, the stimulation or repression of C- or N-acquiring enzymes could influence rates of SOM decomposition (Burns et al., 2013).”
Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis (2017, background): “Unfortunately, despite this long history, the importance of protocol standardization today is too often overlooked, as shown in the review of Burns et al. (2013).”
Stoichiometry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils (2016, background): “An additional assumption is that microbial communities exhibit optimum resource allocation with respect to enzyme expression and environmental resources (Allison and Vitousek 2005, Hernandez and Hobbie 2010, Burns et al. 2013).”
Trends in soil microbial communities during secondary succession (2017, background): “2), enzyme assays are a measure of potential activity under optimal enzyme reaction conditions that could be different with realistic or in situ activity (Burns et al., 2013).”
Why are plant–soil feedbacks so unpredictable, and what to do about it? (2018, background): “(a) Increasing temperatures will result in more negative PSFs to fast-growing plants due to increased pathogen pressure (Burns et al., 2013; Mohan et al., 2014), while slow-growing plants will also experience increasingly negative PSFs due to the loss of mutualists under higher temperatures (Mohan…”
Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics (2016, background): “Because they degrade complex organic compounds by secreting extracellular enzymes into the environment, the activities of these enzymes are often examined for insights to nutrient cycling (Sinsabaugh et al., 2008; Burns et al., 2013).”
Thermal acclimation of organic matter decomposition in an artificial forest soil is related to shifts in microbial community structure (2014, background): “(2013), and supports the established temperature-dependency of soil extracellular enzymes when other factors such as soil moisture and substrate availability remain constant (Davidson et al., 2006; Henry, 2012; Burns et al., 2013).”
Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria: Biodiversity and Multifunctional Attributes for Sustainable Agriculture (2017, background): “amount of root exudates and rhizo deposition can also affect soil structure directly or by increasing the microbial population and activities, indirectly [154-156].”
Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability (2014, background): “…signals of resource avail- ability, which include the products of extracellular enzymatic reactions, as well as chemical signals that convey information on the presence and abundance of nearby organisms (Sinsabaugh and Follstad Shah 2012; Burns et al. 2013; Zhuang et al. 2013; Vega et al. 2014).”
Effects of pesticides on soil enzymes: a review (2014, background): “Finally, the impact of differences between methodological approaches should not be forgotten as reported by Burns et al. (2013).”
Eco-enzymatic stoichiometry and enzymatic vectors reveal differential C, N, P dynamics in decaying litter along a land-use gradient (2016, background): “Microbes are thought to regulate EEA in response to soil resource availability to fulfill their nutrient requirements (e.g., Sinsabaugh and Follstad Shah 2012; Burns et al. 2013).”