Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan west: new insights from rapidly growing communities

By W. Beyers, P. Nelson. 2000

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Business Networks and Economic Development in Rural Communities in the United States (2010, background): “While weak ties are important (North & Smallbone, 2006), in the absence of strong ties they are likely to be ephemeral (Woodhouse, 2006), providing information but not the social capital based on trust and reciprocity that may be needed to act upon that information (cf. Beyers & Nelson, 2000).”
Writing the New West: A Critical Review. (2009, background): “Nonhistorians, too, have noted that these industries should not be dismissed as no longer important (Beyers and Nelson 2000).”
Ecological Causes and Consequences of Demographic Change in the New West (2002, background): “Some 67% of the counties in the Rocky Mountains grew faster than the national average during the 1990s (Beyers and Nelson 2000).”
Taking Over the Reins: Trends and Impacts of Changes in Rural Property Ownership (2010, background): “their place of business have also been identified as factors underpinning the rural rebound ( Beyers and Nelson 2000 ).”
Digital development in rural areas: potentials and pitfalls $ (2003, background): “Return migration is an increasingly common but under-researched phenomenon and, like retirement and migration generally, has an ‘event history’ that suggests it is difficult to predict with accuracy, complicated by the prevalence of two-earner households (Bailey and Cooke, 1998; Beyers and Nelson, 2”