Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention

By Jacquelien van Stekelenburg, B. Klandermans. 2007

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cafef05ce6741c281bf2638c55e5fa3332660098

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. P. G. Klandermans
2. Jacquelien van Stekelenburg
3. Wilco W. van Dijk
4. Anna Wlodarczyk
5. B. Klandermans
6. Amandeep Dhir
7. Heather J. Smith
8. Puneet Kaur

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. G. Klandermans
2. T. Pettigrew
3. Amandeep Dhir
4. Puneet Kaur
5. Jacquelien van Stekelenburg
6. Heather J. Smith
7. W. V. Dijk
8. Wilco W. van Dijk

Citations in the corpus

• Drivers of food waste reduction behaviour in the household context (2021, background): “Instead of working for one’s goals and aspirations, most individuals have shown a common interest and reflected a high identification with a group (Van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2017).”
• Relative Deprivation (2012, background): “And one could compare GRD to traditional resource mobilization theories as predictors of collective behavior (van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2010).”
• Hope and Anger as Mediators Between Collective Action Frames and Participation in Collective Mobilization: The Case of 15-M (2017, background): “Also, as demonstrated by van Stekelenburg and Klandermans (2007), emotions may be viewed as amplifiers of existing motivations, rather than as a separate pathway to collective action (van Zomeren et al., 2004).”
• Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics (2009, background): “Although the emphasis in the social psychology of protest is on the individual level, protest participation takes place in a wider context (Klandermans, 1997; van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2007).”
• Combining motivations and emotion: The motivational dynamics of protest participation (2011, background): “Unlike van Zomeren et al. (2004), we argue that group-based anger amplifies existing motives rather than makes for a separate path (Klandermans, van der Toorn & van Stekelenburg, 2008; van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2007).”
• Identity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Protest (2014, background): “…of social psychologists is involved in studies of protest behavior, and in their models, the concept of identity occupies a central place (Azzi, Chryssochoou, Klandermans, & Simon, 2011; Iyer & van Zomeren, 2009; Stryker, Owens, & White, 2000; van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2007 for overviews).”
• Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “In contrast, the micro-psychological foundations of social movement dynamics are just starting to be studied (Van Stekelenburg and Klandermans, 2017).”