Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach

By Trine Krogh Boomsma, Nigel Meade, Stein-Erik Fleten. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: a review (2017, unknown): “ROA supplements the information provided by static evaluation approaches, by recognising that in an uncertain future one needs to have the flexibility to adjust the timing of the investment decision [109,153].”
Evaluating investments in renewable energy under policy risks (2016, unknown): “Brink (2004) further analyzes political risks and distinguishes political risk factors depending on economic, political and social factors. Further (empirical) analyses of specific aspects of policy and regulatory risks as well as risk drivers are studied in Alesina and Perotti (1996), Barradale (20”
The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) on low carbon energy (LCE) investment (2016, background): “many and Norway; by Boomsma et al. (2012) to evaluate a wind”
Hydrogen Storage for Wind Parks - A Real Options Evaluation for an Optimal Investment in More Flexibility (2014, background): “Boomsma et al. (2012) consider various political measures for the promotion of renewable energies, which are regulated by feed-in tariff and a green certificate trading scheme.”