Team Incentives and Performance: Evidence from a Retail Chain
By Guido Friebel, Matthias Heinz, M. Krüger, Nikolay Zubanov. Social Science Research Network, 2015
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We test the effectiveness of team incentives by running a natural field experiment in a retail chain of 193 shops and 1,300 employees. As a response to intensified product market competition, the firm offered a bonus to shop teams for surpassing sales targets. A bonus to teams rather than individuals was a natural choice because the firm does not measure individual performance and relies on flexible task allocation among employees. On average, the team bonus increases sales and customer visits in the treated shops by around 3%, and wages by 2.3%. The bonus is highly profitable for the firm, generating for each bonus dollar an extra $3.80 of sales, and $2.10 of operational profit. The results show the importance of complementarities within teams and suggest that improved operational efficiency is the main mechanism behind the treatment effect. Our analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects offers a number of insights about the anatomy of teamwork. The firm decided to roll out the bonus to all of its shops, and the performance of treatment and control shops converged after the roll-out.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cadba636de38f6cb6c22e27715d43caa443b20f2
Citations in the corpus
- Management and Shocks to Worker Productivity (2019, unknown): “…(Costa, 1988; Holmstrom and Tirole, 1989; Lazear and Oyer, 2007), the empirical literature on evaluating the importance of task assignment within firms is relatively recent (Amodio and Martinez-Carrasco, 2018; Bandiera et al., 2007, 2009; Burgess et al., 2010; Friebel et al., 2017; Hjort, 2014).”