A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communication
By Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Frances Corry, H. Sridharan, Mike Ananny, J. Schultz, Kate Crawford. 2021
39 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Datasets are central to training machine learning (ML) models. The ML community has recently made significant improvements to data stewardship and documentation practices across the model development life cycle. However, the act of deprecating, or deleting, datasets has been largely overlooked, and there are currently no standardized approaches for structuring this stage of the dataset life cycle. In this paper, we study the practice of dataset deprecation in ML, identify several cases of datasets that continued to circulate despite having been deprecated, and describe the different technical, legal, ethical, and organizational issues raised by such continuations. We then propose a Dataset Deprecation Framework that includes considerations of risk, mitigation of impact, appeal mechanisms, timeline, post-deprecation protocols, and publication checks that can be adapted and implemented by the ML community. Finally, we propose creating a centralized, sustainable repository system for archiving datasets, tracking dataset modifications or deprecations, and facilitating practices of care and stewardship that can be integrated into research and publication processes.
Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
Citations in the corpus
- Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text (2022, background): “For example, Lyu et al. (2021) work on lexical consistency for document-level MT, which they first analyze and then derive a metric from.”