Standard methods for wax moth research

By J. Ellis, Jason R. Graham, A. Mortensen. 2013

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cab717f008b7ed66e7d0a1da8cdd59813cb4b501

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Robert Brodschneider
2. P. Neumann
3. P. Mędrzycki
4. R. Paxton
5. J. V. D. van der Steen
6. T. Murray
7. D. Shutler
8. S. Pernal

In Genetics

1. Robert Brodschneider
2. P. Neumann
3. P. Mędrzycki
4. R. Paxton
5. J. V. D. van der Steen
6. G. Tanner
7. T. Murray
8. D. Shutler

In Insect Science

1. Robert Brodschneider
2. P. Neumann
3. P. Mędrzycki
4. G. Tanner
5. I. Fries
6. Geoffrey R. Williams
7. R. Paxton
8. J. V. D. van der Steen

Citations in the corpus

• Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions (2013, background): “…for Tropilaelaps spp., de Graaf et al. (2013) for American foulbrood, de Miranda et al. (2013) for viruses, Dietemann et al. (2013) for Varroa spp., Ellis et al. (2013) for wax moth, Forsgren et al. (2013) for European foulbrood, Fries et al. (2013) for Nosema spp., Jensen et al. (2013) for fungi,…”