The Dynamics of Cognitive Interviewing

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cognitive Interviewing Practice (2014, result): “Therefore we recommend that the probing part of the interview should be semi-structured and involve both scripted probes and opportunities for spontaneous probing, in line with what Beatty (2004) and Beatty and Willis (2007) recommend.”
Do Differing Types of Field Experiences Make a Difference in Teacher Candidates' Perceived Level of Competence? (2010, methodology): “(p. 13) Limitations and Implications The discussion relating to the concerns with trustworthiness of self-report data typically centers on one of two points (Beatty, 2003, 2004).”
The Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF): towards the harmonization of cognitive testing reports. (2013, methodology): “Most generally, cognitive interviewing (or cognitive testing) is engaged as a means for applying qualitative research methods to the understanding of the functioning of survey questions – as well as of other materials, such as advance letters (Beatty, 2004; DeMaio & Rothgeb, 1996; Willis, 1999, 2005”
International handbook of survey methodology. (2008, background): ““The fact that cognitive interviewing is widely practiced is indisputable, but it is not always completely clear what the practice entails” (Beatty, 2004, p. 45). For example, some organizations use predominantly think-aloud (see Forsyth & Lessler, 1991—Research Triangle Institute), others, predomin”