Precise comparison of theory and new experiment for the Casimir force leads to stronger constraints on thermal quantum effects and long-range interactions

By Ricardo S. Decca, Daniel López, Ephraim Fischbach, Galina L. Klimchitskaya, Dennis E. Krause, Vladimir M. Mostepanenko. 2005

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We report an improved dynamic determination of the Casimir pressure Pexpt between two plane plates obtained using a micromachined torsional oscillator. The main improvements in the current experiment are a significant suppression of the surface roughness of the Au layers deposited on the interacting surfaces, and a decrease by a factor of 1.7 (down to 0.6 nm) in the experimental error in the measurement of the absolute separation. A metrological analysis of all data for Pexpt from 15 sets of measurements permitted us to determine both the random and systematic errors, and to find the total experimental error in Pexpt as a function of separation at the 95% confidence level. In contrast to all previous experiments on the Casimir effect, where a small relative error was achieved only at the shortest separation, our smallest experimental error (∼0.5%) is achieved over a wide separation range. The theoretical Casimir pressures Ptheor in the experimental configuration were calculated by the use of four theoretical approaches suggested in the literature based on the Lifshitz formula at nonzero temperature. All corrections to the Casimir force due to grain structure of the overlying metal layers (including the variation of optical data and patch potentials), surface roughness (including nonmultiplicative and diffraction-type effects), and nonlocal effects, were calculated or estimated. The maximum value of the roughness correction, achieved at the shortest separation of 160 nm, is equal to only 0.65% of the Casimir pressure. All theoretical errors, including those introduced by the proximity force theorem, finite size of the plate area, and uncertainties in the experimental separations, were analyzed and metrologically combined to obtain the total theoretical error at the 95% confidence level. Finally, the confidence interval for (Ptheor − Pexpt) was obtained as a function of separation. Our measurements are found to be consistent with two theoretical approaches utilizing the plasma model and the surface impedance over the entire measurement region from 160 to 750 nm. Two other approaches to the thermal Casimir force, utilizing the Drude model or a special prescription for the determination of the zero-frequency contribution to the Lifshitz formula, are excluded on the basis of our measurements at the 99 and 95% confidence levels, respectively. Finally, constraints on Yukawa-type hypothetical interactions are strengthened by up to a factor of 20 in a wide interaction range.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/caa187f38e978e730319889291899c18c03365fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Civil and Structural Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Observation of the thermal Casimir force (2010, result): “In this model, the TE ω =0 mode does contribute to the finite-temperature force, with a magnitude that at large plate separations is double the Drude result: Some Casimir force measurements at small plate separations ( d nm ) have been interpreted as being in agreement with the plasma mode”
Casimir Forces and Quantum Electrodynamical Torques: Physics and Nanomechanics (2007, result): “In a number of studies, several authors [19], [22], [23] have”
The Casimir force between real materials: Experiment and theory (2009, methodology): “The most precise measurements of the Casimir force between metallic surfaces were performed in a series of experiments by Decca et al. (2003a, 2003b, 2004, 2005b, 2007a, 2007b) using a micromechanical torsional oscillator.”
Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions (2015, result): “In contrast, several other Casimir experiments (Banishev et al., 2013b; Decca et al., 2005) seem to be in agreement with the plasma model description, which is surprising given that this model neglects dissipation effects in metals.”