Catering for the needs of fauna in fire management: science or just wishful thinking?

By M. Clarke. 2008

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca9a4f765b8476d14176c1476669b428fadaf7ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Declines of prairie butterflies in the midwestern USA (2011, unknown): “On a different continent, Clarke (2008) and New et al.”
REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire‐prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance (2013, background): “The optimal spatial arrangement of refuge patches within the postfire environment will vary amongst species (Bradstock et al. 2005; Clarke 2008), and the value of differ-”
Amplified predation after fire suppresses rodent populations in Australia’s tropical savannas (2016, background): “2008), in most cases, the demographic processes that lead to these changes in abundance are unknown (Parr and Andersen 2006; Clarke 2008; Driscoll et al. 2010; Kelly et al. 2012; Zwolak et al. 2012).”
Fire severity and landscape context effects on arboreal marsupials (2013, unknown): “However, there are comparatively few landscape context studies 79 in fire-modified landscapes (Bradstock et al. 2012; Clarke 2008; McKenzie et al. 2011) that 80 document the occurrence of species on unburned sites where the surrounding landscape has 81 been burned.”
Resolving conflicts in fire management using decision theory: asset‐protection versus biodiversity conservation (2010, background): “Contributing to this conflict is a frequent mismatch between policy rhetoric, which claims to manage fire for biodiversity conservation, and its implementation and knowledge base (DellaSala et al. 2004; Clarke 2008).”
Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them (2010, background): “To meet management goals aimed at maintaining all species within a region, accurate knowledge about a broader range of species and their responses to fire is needed (Clarke, 2008; DellaSala et al., 2004; Keith et al., 2002).”
Fire frequency matters more than fire size: Testing the pyrodiversity-biodiversity paradigm for at-risk small mammals in an Australian tropical savanna (2015, background): “Furthermore, the hypothesis has largely been built on the assumption that meeting needs of plant communities will automatically meet the needs of animal species (Clarke, 2008).”
Effect of fire on small mammals: a systematic review (2014, background): “2013) and many fire management practices that consider biodiversity conservation are based on limited information and often centred on plant communities (e.g. Parr and Chown 2003; Clarke 2008).”
Small mammals decline with increasing fire extent in northern Australia: evidence from long-term monitoring in Kakadu National Park (2015, unknown): “2011), requiring a clear understanding of the effects of the timing, frequency and scale of fires on biodiversity (Clarke 2008; Driscoll et al. 2010; Kelly et al. 2011).”
Influence of fire history on small mammal distributions: insights from a 100‐year post‐fire chronosequence (2011, background): “Such temporal mismatches limit ecological understanding (Clarke, 2008; Clarke et al., 2010).”