Critical Narrative Analysis in Psychology

By Peter Emerson, S. Frosh. 2004

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca69ee04d7f5a5da6071bc724adb563fc1f3b27e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data (2010, background): “The inclusion of the subjectivity of the interviewer as well as of the participant in narrative analysis has led to the development of critical approaches (e.g. Emerson and Frosh, 2004) and many diverse forms arising from the diversity of investigators’ theoretical and epistemological frameworks.”
Introduction: What is narrative research? (2008, background): “So does the recent burst of empirically-based texts focused on specific studies, (Andrews, 2007; Emerson and Frosh, 2004; McAdams, 2006; Mishler, 1999; Squire, 2007; Tamboukou, 2003), the rich crop of narrativelythemed collections of essays (Andrews et al., 2004; Bamberg and Andrews, 2004;…”
What is Narrative Research (2014, background): “So does the recent burst of empirically-based texts focused on specific studies, (Andrews, 2007; Emerson and Frosh, 2004; McAdams, 2006; Mishler, 1999; Squire, 2007; Tamboukou, 2003), the rich crop of narrativelythemed collections of essays (Andrews et al.”
From Experience-Centred to Socioculturally-Oriented Approaches to Narrative (2013, background): “On approach comparisons, see Emerson and Frosh (2004), Freeman (2003), Parker (2003), Riessman (2008) and Rustin (2000).”
Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts (2005, background): “…interview data both reveal background theoretical assumptions (for example, that emphases or other paralinguistic features are indicators of meaning, or that content is context-independent) and produce alternate and sometimes contradictory readings of the material (Emerson and Frosh, 2004).”