Two linear transformations each tridiagonal with respect to an eigenbasis of the other: An Algebraic approach to the Askey scheme of orthogonal polynomials

By Paul M. Terwilliger. 2004

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Let $K$ denote a field, and let $V$ denote a vector space over $K$ with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations $A:V\to V$ and $A^*:V\to V$ that satisfy the following two conditions: There exists a basis for $V$ with respect to which the matrix representing $A$ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing $A^*$ is diagonal. There exists a basis for $V$ with respect to which the matrix representing $A^*$ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing $A$ is diagonal. We call such a pair a Leonard pair on $V$. We give a correspondence between Leonard pairs and a class of orthogonal polynomials. This class coincides with the terminating branch of the Askey scheme and consists of the $q$-Racah, $q$-Hahn, dual $q$-Hahn, $q$-Krawtchouk, dual $q$-Krawtchouk, quantum $q$-Krawtchouk, affine $q$-Krawtchouk, Racah, Hahn, dual Hahn, Krawtchouk, Bannai/Ito, and orphan polynomials. We describe the above correspondence in detail. We show how, for the listed polynomials, the 3-term recurrence, difference equation, Askey-Wilson duality, and orthogonality can be expressed in a uniform and attractive manner using the corresponding Leonard pair. We give some examples that indicate how Leonard pairs arise in representation theory and algebraic combinatorics. We discuss a mild generalization of a Leonard pair called a tridiagonal pair. At the end we list some open problems. Throughout these notes our argument is elementary and uses only linear algebra. No prior exposure to the topic is assumed.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca5d9fd32c2b49b73de61b15db64f2963c7280f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

  1. Paul M. Terwilliger
  2. Alexei S. Zhedanov
  3. Luc Vinet
  4. Plamen Iliev
  5. 伊藤 達郎
  6. Hau-wen Huang
  7. Tatsuro Ito
  8. Satoshi Tsujimoto

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Tatsuro Ito
  2. Plamen Iliev
  3. Alexei S. Zhedanov
  4. Luc Vinet
  5. 伊藤 達郎
  6. Hau-wen Huang
  7. Paul M. Terwilliger
  8. Satoshi Tsujimoto

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Tatsuro Ito
  2. Alexei S. Zhedanov
  3. Luc Vinet
  4. Plamen Iliev
  5. Paul M. Terwilliger
  6. 伊藤 達郎
  7. Hau-wen Huang
  8. Satoshi Tsujimoto

Citations in the corpus