Individual Acoustic Variation in Fallow Deer (Dama dama) Common and Harsh Groans: A Source-Filter Theory Perspective

By Elisabetta Vannoni, A. McElligott. 2007

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca51b772204cd4ff7c4a80520040d4138f663ec5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Anna M. Taylor
2. D. Reby
3. W. Tecumseh Fitch
4. R. Fay
5. A. Popper
6. R. Suthers
7. E. Briefer
8. A. McElligott

In Ecology

1. Anna M. Taylor
2. W. Tecumseh Fitch
3. D. Reby
4. A. Popper
5. E. Briefer
6. A. McElligott
7. K. McComb
8. Elisabetta Vannoni

In Signal Processing

1. A. Popper
2. D. Reby

Citations in the corpus

• The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research (2010, background): “Several studies have now highlighted the importance of the inter-play of source and filter components for reliable identification of a caller (fallow deer: Reby et al., 1998; Vannoni & McElligott, 2007; rhesus monkeys: Rendall et al., 1998).”
• Vertebrate Sound Production and Acoustic Communication (2016, background): “…red deer ( Cervus elaphus ; Fitch and Reby 2001 ; Reby and McComb 2003 ; Charlton et al. 2007 ), fallow deer ( Dama dama ; McElligott et al. 2006 ; Vannoni and McElligott 2007 ), and koalas ( Phascolarctos cinereus ; Charlton et al. 2011 , 2012 ), along with a variety of other mammalian species…”