Kernel Codebooks for Scene Categorization
By Jan van Gemert, Jan-Mark Geusebroek, Cor J. Veenman, Arnold M. W. Smeulders. 2008
239 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Andrew Zisserman
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Jitendra Malik
In Media Technology
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Yu Qiao
- Florent Perronnin
- Andrew Zisserman
- Subhransu Maji
- Xiaoou Tang
- Thomas S. Huang
- Iasonas Kokkinos
Citations in the corpus
- Describing Textures in the Wild (2013, methodology): “1), soft quantization with a kernel in KCB [37], Localityconstrained Linear Coding (LLC) [41], or specialized quantization schemes, such as mapping LBPs to uniform patterns [25] (LBP; we use the rotation invariant multipleradii version of [24] for comparison purposes).”
- From BoW to CNN: Two Decades of Texture Representation for Texture Classification (2018, methodology): “• Soft Voting [2, 196, 232] Assigns each feature to multiple codewords; Does not minimize reconstruction error.”
- Learning Feature Representations with K-Means (2012, methodology): “When we are unhappy with performance, searching for better choices of these parameters can often be more beneficial than trying to modify our learning algorithm [11,18].”
- Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification (2009, methodology): “Following our own baseline, the Linear ScSPM algorithm again achieves much better performance than KSPM and KC [25].”
- Locality-constrained Linear Coding for image classification (2010, unknown): “10 Gemert [8] - - - - - 64.”
- A Review on Human Activity Recognition Using Vision-Based Method (2017, unknown): “(2008) [60], 586; [61], 761 Spase coding (SPC) Yang et al.”
- Large-scale web video event classification by use of Fisher Vectors (2013, methodology): “Although modifications to BoW can help it capture more information, such as assigning different weights to codewords and soft assignment of codewords[16], GMM incorporates them naturally.”
- A Comparative Study of Encoding, Pooling and Normalization Methods for Action Recognition (2012, methodology): “The soft-assignment encoding has two forms: assigning each feature to all codeword (SA-all) [15] and assigning each feature to k nearest neighborhood (SA-k) [1].”
- Learning a discriminative dictionary for sparse coding via label consistent K-SVD (2011, methodology): “We evaluate our approach using spatial pyramid features and compare the results with K-SVD [1], D-KSVD [33], SRC [28] and other state-of-art approaches [32, 15, 11, 2, 14, 24, 8, 29, 27].”
- k-Sparse Autoencoders (2013, background): “For example, while in k - means, it is natural to have a hard-assignment of the points to the nearest cluster in the encoding stage, it has been shown in (Van Gemert et al., 2008) that soft assignments result in better classification performance.”
- Understanding bag-of-words model: a statistical framework (2010, background): “Tuytelaars and Schmid (2007) propose a quantization method that discretizes a feature space by a regular lattice. van Gemert et al.(2008) use kernel density estimation to avoid the problem of 'codeword uncertainty' and 'codeword plausibility'.”
- In defense of soft-assignment coding (2011, methodology): “In this paper, we follow the original softassignment coding scheme [6, 14] to define d(xi,bl) as squared Euclidean distance but other distances can certainly be used.”
- Aggregating Continuous Word Embeddings for Information Retrieval (2013, methodology): “These improvements include the soft assignment of descriptors to visual words (Farquhar et al., 2005; Philbin et al., 2008; Gemert et al., 2008) or the use of more advanced coding techniques than vector quantization such as sparse coding (Yang et al., 2009) or locality-constrained linear coding…”
- Discriminatively Trained Dense Surface Normal Estimation (2014, methodology): “Each feature was clustered into 512 visual words using k-means clustering, and for each pixel a soft assignment for 8 nearest cluster centres is calculated using distance-based exponential kernel weighting [49].”