Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature*

By P. Marik, R. Cavallazzi, T. Vasu, A. Hirani. Critical Care Medicine, 2009

1,180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does the Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness? An Updated Meta-Analysis and a Plea for Some Common Sense* (2013, background): “Furthermore, clinical studies have clearly demonstrated that ventricular volumes (RVEDVI, left ventricular end-diastolic area, global enddiastolic volumes) are unable to predict fluid responsiveness (25, 46, 52, 54, 66).”
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 (2013, background): “A systematic review (29 trials, n = 685 critically ill patients) looked at the association between stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and/or stroke volume variation and the change in stroke volume/ cardiac index after a fluid or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) challenge [132]”
Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy (2011, methodology): “With remarkable consistency, a variation of greater than 12% to 13% has been reported to be highly predictive of volume responsiveness (Table 2) [15].”
Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group (2012, methodology): “Traditional methods based on clinical examination and static measurements of right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures are of questionable accuracy in predicting volume responsiveness and should be used with caution [49-53].”