FEMALE PHILOPATRY AND EXTREME SPATIAL GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN WHITE-TAILED DEER

By James R. Purdue, Michael H. Smith, J. Patton. 2000

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca19b4c96f81914bd5d0fa3cf57d0a4dd95ce74d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Huston
2. Steve Wolverton
3. R. Honeycutt
4. R. Deyoung

In Genetics

1. M. Huston
2. Steve Wolverton
3. R. Honeycutt
4. R. Deyoung

Citations in the corpus

• Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer (2008, unknown): “2005) and because of this, local populations of males are, presumably, less related than females (Purdue et al. 2000).”
• Genetic consequences of hunting: what do we know and what should we do? (2002, unknown): “It appears that local differences in whitetailed deer are maintained by philopatry among females, but subpopulations are prevented from becoming too subdivided by male dispersal (Mathews and Porter 1993, Purdue et al. 2000; see Cronin et al. 1991 for similar findings in mule deer, O. hemionus).”
• THE MOLECULAR TOOLBOX: GENETIC TECHNIQUES IN WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (2005, background): “…species that show strong female philopatry in terms of nesting sites (e.g., sea turtles; Bowen et al. 1992), rookeries (e.g., sea lions; Bickham et al. 1996), and areas close to the natal group (e.g., white-tailed deer; Purdue et al. 2000) show strong structuring of populations along female lines.”
• Conformation to Bergmann's Rule in White-tailed Deer can be Explained by Food Availability (2009, background): “…requirements than does but also greater phenotypic plasticity in body size (Beier and McCullough, 1990; Comer et al., 2005; Lesage et al., 2001; Purdue et al., 2000; Weckerly, 1993) and literally ‘‘have more to lose’’ at high population densities especially in unfavorable habitat (Lesage et…”
• The implications of philopatry in sharks for the management of shark fisheries (2004, unknown): “Recent studies of terrestrial animals have examined philopatric trends in a diversity of mammals including bats (Kurta and Murray, 2002), deer (Purdue et al., 2000), and even ancestral hominids (O’Connell et al.”
• Regulation of animal size by eNPP, Bergmann's rule, and related phenomena (2011, background): “Such phenotypic plasticity in body size and the white-tailed deer’s highly generalized diet allow its nonmigratory, low-dispersal, highly philopatric, maintenance phenotype (Geist 1998, Purdue et al. 2000, Comer et al. 2005).”