Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics
By Christopher Lucas, Richard A. Nielsen, Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M Stewart, Alex Storer, Dustin Tingley. Political Analysis, 2015
468 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Social Sciences, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca1469279ace2e341fd385c884129367e1b7dda7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Social Sciences
- Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld
- Brandon M Stewart
- Margaret E. Roberts
- Dustin Tingley
- S. Gadarian
- Jetson Leder-Luis
- Christopher Lucas
- David G. Rand
In Political Science and International Relations
- Brandon M Stewart
- Margaret E. Roberts
- S. Gadarian
- B. Albertson
- Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld
- Jetson Leder-Luis
- Susan T. Fiske
- Christopher Lucas
Citations in the corpus
- stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models (2019, methodology): “In this paper, we provide brief interpretations of results, and we direct readers to the companion papers (Roberts et al. 2013, 2014; Lucas et al. 2015) for complete applications.”
- Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses (2014, methodology): “In a companion paper, we provide a thorough contrast of our method to supervised learning techniques (Lucas et al. 2013).”
- Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modelling (2016, methodology): “Lucas et al. (2015) apply topic modelling to different types of documents such as fatwas and social media posts in order to facilitate comparison between countries.”
- Comprehensive stereotype content dictionaries using a semi‐automated method (2020, background): “Language and text analysis have a long history in psychology (e.g., Dewey, 1910; Miller, 1951; see Boyd, 2017 for a review) and affiliated fields ranging from Sociology and Political Science (see Lucas et al., 2015) to Computer Science (see Nerbonne, 2003).”
- A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences (2016, methodology): “In related work, we have applied these methods to study open-ended survey responses (Roberts et al. 2014b), comparative politics literature (Lucas et al. 2015), and studentgenerated text in massive open online courses (Reich et al. 2015).”
- Twitter as Data (2018, background): “Computationally analyzing text is a growing field in the social sciences (Grimmer and Stewart, 2013; Lucas et al., 2015), and Twitter provides scholars with large corpora.”