Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

By Philip W. Bateman, L. N. Gilson, J. Ferguson. 2001

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca02a89480d9261d58a349c3cda6e64b4b35945c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. D. Roff
2. D. Robinson
3. M. Rantala
4. Marion Hall
5. R. Kortet
6. A. Hedrick

In Genetics

1. D. Roff
2. M. Rantala
3. D. Robinson
4. Marion Hall
5. R. Kortet
6. A. Hedrick
7. Tadeusz J. Kawecki

Citations in the corpus

• Sound signalling in orthoptera (2002, background): “Such preferences for large males may not always be absolute: Bateman et al. (2001) found that female Gryllus bimaculatus are indiscriminate for their first mating (when the costs of not mating could be very high) and only choose larger males in later matings.”
• Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies (2005, unknown): “In contrast, females who had mated first with large males accepted small males as second mates in less than 50% of the trials (Bateman et al., 2001).”
• Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris (2003, background): “Studies on orthopterans (reviewed by Andersson 1994) and crickets (Hedrick 1986; Simmons & Ritchie 1996; Wagner 1996; Bateman et al. 2001 ) have shown that females incorporate short-term or long-term signal components in mate choice.”
• The evolution and evolutionary consequences of social plasticity in mate preferences (2013, unknown): “There is widespread support for this hypothesis, including studies in crickets (Bateman et al. 2001; Wagner et al. 2001; Bailey & Zuk 2008, 2009; Rebar et al. 2011), fruit flies (O’Hara et al. 1976; Dukas 2006), sticklebacks (Kozak & Boughman 2009), treehoppers (Fowler-Finn & Rodríguez 2012a, b)…”
• An analysis of trade‐offs in immune function, body size and development time in the Mediterranean Field Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (2005, background): “Large body size has often been found to be advantageous in sexual selection (reviewed in Andersson 1994), and specifically in G. bimaculatus male body size has been shown to have important implications for its competitive ability and mating success (Simmons 1986; Bateman, Gilson & Ferguson 2001 ).”
• Evolution of female choosiness and mating frequency: effects of mating cost, density and sex ratio (2012, unknown): “1992) and insects (Bateman et al. 2001).”