Static and dynamic characterization of regular truncated icosahedral and dodecahedral tensegrity modules

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A new approach to the analytical and numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures (2013, background): “The force densities obtained for the first case (super-stable) are in complete agreement with the first equation above (see also Koohestani, 2012; Murakami and Nishimura, 2001; Zhang et al., 2013), while the other two cases exactly satisfy the second equation.”
Tensegrity frameworks: Dynamic analysis review and open problems (2009, methodology): “Murakami [55, 56], Murakami and Nishimura [58, 57] also used Lagrangian formulation to model the dynamic behavior of a tensegrity structure taking into account additional non-linear effects, such as the deformability of the structure edges and the non-linear elasticity of the tensional members.”
Dynamic behavior and vibration control of a tensegrity structure (2010, methodology): “This simplified approach was first used to investigate the dynamic behavior of simple tensegrity modules and then extended to more complex configurations (Murakami and Nishimura 2001a; Sultan et al. 2002).”
Algebraic tensegrity form-finding (2005, background): “This stiffness matrix matches its FEM definition for prestressed trusses given in the literature, see, e.g., Murakami and Nishimura (2001).”