Earthquake detection through computationally efficient similarity search

By Clara E. Yoon, Ossian O’Reilly, Karianne J. Bergen, Gregory C. Beroza. Science Advances, 2015

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Data mining techniques applied to continuous waveforms reveal many previously unknown small earthquakes. Seismology is experiencing rapid growth in the quantity of data, which has outpaced the development of processing algorithms. Earthquake detection—identification of seismic events in continuous data—is a fundamental operation for observational seismology. We developed an efficient method to detect earthquakes using waveform similarity that overcomes the disadvantages of existing detection methods. Our method, called Fingerprint And Similarity Thresholding (FAST), can analyze a week of continuous seismic waveform data in less than 2 hours, or 140 times faster than autocorrelation. FAST adapts a data mining algorithm, originally designed to identify similar audio clips within large databases; it first creates compact “fingerprints” of waveforms by extracting key discriminative features, then groups similar fingerprints together within a database to facilitate fast, scalable search for similar fingerprint pairs, and finally generates a list of earthquake detections. FAST detected most (21 of 24) cataloged earthquakes and 68 uncataloged earthquakes in 1 week of continuous data from a station located near the Calaveras Fault in central California, achieving detection performance comparable to that of autocorrelation, with some additional false detections. FAST is expected to realize its full potential when applied to extremely long duration data sets over a distributed network of seismic stations. The widespread application of FAST has the potential to aid in the discovery of unexpected seismic signals, improve seismic monitoring, and promote a greater understanding of a variety of earthquake processes.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9ee356b303a06b7a5475f076ffa2ef150d2bbb6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Gregory C. Beroza
  2. S. M. Mousavi
  3. Weiqiang Zhu
  4. Khemraj Shukla
  5. Majid Rasht-Behesht
  6. C. Huber
  7. William Ellsworth
  8. G. Em Karniadakis

In Geophysics

  1. Gregory C. Beroza
  2. S. M. Mousavi
  3. Weiqiang Zhu
  4. William Ellsworth
  5. Karianne J. Bergen
  6. P. Johnson
  7. Peter Gerstoft
  8. Wing Kam Liu

Citations in the corpus