How do people manage their digital photographs?

By Kerry Rodden, Kenneth R. Wood. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003

501 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9e77e4cd53762ef4212807770a699aefd50e411

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges (2010, background): “[158] also examined digital photograph activities, observing a distinct lack of annotation activity and the utility of temporal structuring in exploration of photo archives.”
Give and take: a study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice (2007, background): “A wellknown challenge is the difficulty of organizing digital photographs, and the reluctance of most consumers to invest significant time in this activity [2,4,18].”
Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media (2007, background): “While some of this research has been incorporated into commercial photo browsing systems (like Adobe Photoshop Album), most people still do not bother with annotation of their photos [17], though they do say they think it would be useful for photo retrieval and wished they did it much more.”
Content-based image retrieval: approaches and trends of the new age (2005, unknown): “For designing querying/visualization for image retrieval systems, it helps to understand factors like how people manage their digital photographs [84] or frame their queries for visual art images [23].”
Digital photography: communication, identity, memory (2008, background): “…engineers are becoming more aware that the design of picture management systems requires a profound understanding of why and how users interact with their pictures: storing pictures in a shoebox or sticking them into albums cannot simply be transposed onto digital platforms (Rodden and Wood, 2003).”
Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age (2008, background): “In order to design interfaces for image retrieval systems, it helps to understand factors like how people manage their digital photographs [Rodden and Wood 2003] or frame their queries for visual art images [Cunningham et al.”
EasyAlbum: an interactive photo annotation system based on face clustering and re-ranking (2007, background): “According to the study in [18], people have less motivation to invest the effort in annotating their photos due to heavy workload of manual annotation.”
Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections (2008, background): “There are many techniques and commercial products for browsing sets of photos and much research on the subject of how people tend to organize photos, e.g., (Rodden and Wood 2003).”