Fifteen Arguments Against Hypothetical Frequentism

By Alan Hájek. 2009

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9d6df586fce140e3f18779d79f2c485c9fff5f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Christian Hennig
2. Andrew Gelman
3. F. Oswald
4. Michael Zyphur
5. Blakeley B. McShane
6. Kristopher J Preacher

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. Andrew Gelman
2. Christian Hennig
3. F. Oswald
4. Michael Zyphur
5. Sander Greenland
6. David M. Blei
7. Benigno Uria

In Philosophy

1. F. Oswald
2. Michael Zyphur
3. Andrew Gelman
4. Christian Hennig
5. Sander Greenland
6. David M. Blei
7. Benigno Uria

Citations in the corpus

• Bayesian Estimation and Inference (2015, background): “…to inference about the relative frequency of events or observations in the long run, even though this long run is always unobservable and is disconnected from researchers’ actual interest in single events, theories, hypotheses, or statistical parameters and models (Eagle, 2004; Hájek, 2009).”
• Beyond subjective and objective in statistics (2015, background): “According to Hennig (2010), science aims at arriving at a view of reality that is stable and reliable and can be agreed freely by general observers and is therefore as observer-independent as possible.”