Theory of frequency dependent acoustics in patchy-saturated porous media
By D. Johnson. 2001
383 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9d41a89f927341d5d265562d7deb6c32c5c34bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- José M. Carcione
- M. Brajanovski
- S. Pride
- B. Quintal
- Marcel Frehner
- Holger Steeb
- S. Schmalholz
- Boris Gurevich
In Oceanography
- M. Brajanovski
- Boris Gurevich
- Jerry M. Harris
- José M. Carcione
- R. Galvin
- J. Toms‐Stewart
- James G. Berryman
- Tobias Malte Müller
Citations in the corpus
- White's model for wave propagation in partially saturated rocks: Comparison with poroelastic numerical experiments (2003, background): “Recently, Johnson (2001) developed a generalization of White’s model for patches of arbitrary shape.”
- Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow (2004, methodology): “In the alternative case where k2/k1 1, the length L2 for this same concentric sphere geometry is [e.g., Johnson, 2001] L2 2 = a2/15.”
- A simple model for squirt-flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated granular rocks. (2010, background): “Agood example is a porous rock saturated with patchs of two immiscible fluids Johnson, 2001 in which the low- and igh-frequency moduli are uniquely defined by the properties of the ock matrix, the properties of the two fluids, and their volume fracions.”
- Quasi-static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in poroelastic media (2011, background): “[3] At low seismic frequencies, wave‐induced fluid flow on the mesoscopic scale is presumably the major cause of wave attenuation and velocity dispersion in a partially saturated, porous rock [e.g., Norris, 1993; Johnson, 2001; Pride et al., 2004; Carcione and Picotti, 2006; Müller et al., 2010].”
- P‐wave dispersion and attenuation in fractured and porous reservoirs – poroelasticity approach (2009, methodology): “…we propose the C© 2009 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 225–237 following branching function ansatz (Johnson 2001): 1 csat11 = 1 C [ 1 + ( C − C0 C0 ) / ( 1 − ς + ς √ 1 − iωτ ς2 )] , (13) where the P-wave moduli of the fractured and host…”