Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework

By Joern Birkmann, O. Cardona, M. Carreño, A. Barbat, M. Pelling, S. Schneiderbauer, S. Kienberger, M. Keiler, David Alexander, P. Zeil and 1 more. Natural Hazards, 2013

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9d3e9bd843ab7c71638b73058572e2a30f9e922

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Romero‐Lankao
2. Matthias Garschagen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. F. Groundstroem
2. Alexandra Jurgilevich
3. P. Romero‐Lankao
4. Matthias Garschagen
5. Aleksi Räsänen
6. S. Juhola

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Juhola

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability (2015, background): “Capacities can be different from actually realized (or realizable) coping and adaptation actions (e.g. Romero Lankao and Qin 2011; Birkmann et al. 2013; Romero-Lankao et al. 2012).”
• A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments (2017, methodology): “The other most commonly used approach ‘vulnerability as an outcome’ is in line with more recent frameworks (Cardona et al 2012, Oppenheinmer et al 2014, Birkmann et al 2013).”