Does Green Pay Off
By N. Miller, J. Spivey, Andrew C. Florance. 2008
428 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Marketing, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9d02388b19587d22b47f7405e6d6ceab67b8d1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
- Nils Kok
- Piet Eichholtz
- Andrea M. Chegut
- Franz Fuerst
- Erkan Yönder
- Geoffrey Qiping Shen
- Jing Wu
- Yongheng Deng
In Marketing
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Cities and Green Growth: A Conceptual Framework (2011, background): “Authors Office building rent price premium due to ecolabel Office building sales price premium due to eco-label Office building occupancy rate differential Miller et al. (2008) No statistically significant premium for either Energy Star or LEED Energy Star = +6% LEED = +11%”
- A game theory based analysis of decision making for green retrofit under different occupancy types (2016, background): “Literature Rental Premium Value Premium Occupancy Rate Premium Miller et al. (2008) 9% No Premium 2-4% Eichholtz et al. (2010) 3.3% 1.9% NA Pivo and Fisher (2010) 2.7% 8.5% NA Wiley et al. (2010) 7-17% NA 10-18% Fuerst and McAllister (2011) 4-5% 25-26% 1-3% According to Formula (4), the occupier…”
- Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings (2014, result): “Other studies confirm these findings (Fuerst and McAllister, 2011a; Miller et al., 2008) and, importantly, these results appear robust over the course of the financial crisis—the effect is not dented by the recent downturn in property markets (Eichholtz et al.”
- Portfolio greenness and the financial performance of REITs (2012, result): “These findings corroborate with a rapidly growing body of comparable studies (Fuerst and McAllister, 2011; Miller et al., 2008; Wiley et al., 2010).”
- Sustainable Building Certification and the Rent Premium: A Panel Data Approach (2012, positive): “This result is in accordance with those of Miller, Spivey, and Florance (2008) and Fuerst and McAllister (2009, 2011b), who find occupancy rates to be 2%–4% higher for ENERGY STAR labeled buildings.”