Circumpolar variation in periodicity and synchrony among gypsy moth populations
By Derek M. Johnson, Andrew M. Liebhold, OTTAR N. Bjørnstad, M. Mcmanus. 2005
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9a846652c34d52fab3e787ca72cf6c49296f7fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Natural enemies and environmental factors affecting the population dynamics of the gypsy moth (2013, background): “Moreover, the period between two outbreak events differed with respect to the forest type (xeric, mesic; Johnson et al. 2005; Haynes et al. 2009; Bjornstad et al. 2010).”
- Benefits of invasion prevention: Effect of time lags, spread rates, and damage persistence (2015, background): “In contrast, the gypsy moth exhibits recurrent outbreaks that generally do not kill most host trees but result in periodic impacts indefinitely into the future (Johnson et al., 2005).”
- The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States (2012, background): “observed to be consistent in many populations worldwide (Johnson et al. 2005), outbreaks conforming to a secondary period of 4–5 years have been observed (Johnson et al.”