Variability in echolocation call design of 26 Swiss bat species: consequences, limits and options for automated field identification with a synergetic pattern recognition approach

By Martin K. Obrist, R. Boesch, P. F. Flückiger. 2004

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: The National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain (2015, methodology): “A number of quantitative methods for species identification have also been developed (Parsons and Jones, 2000; Obrist et al., 2004; Walters et al., 2012).”
Landscape connectivity, habitat structure and activity of bat guilds in farmland-dominated matrices (2013, unknown): “Key-words: acoustic monitoring, agricultural landscape, automated species recognition, conservation, echolocation, fragmentation, structural elements”
Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring (2010, methodology): “…have also been subject to efforts in automated recognition, for example, crickets and grasshoppers (Schwenker et al., 2003; Farr and Chesmore, 2007), marine mammals like whales and dolphins (Deecke et al., 1999; Brown and Miller, 2007; Mellinger et al., 2007), frogs and bats ([Obrist et al., 2004).”