ModLoop: automated modeling of loops in protein structures
By András Fiser, Andrej Sali. Bioinform., 2003
803 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c99335e54af8eee440d9ff83297ae8a2fda34a49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Ben M. Webb
- Ursula Pieper
- Marc A. Martí-Renom
- Narayanan Eswar
- Mallur Srivatsan Madhusudhan
- Min-Yi Shen
- David Eramian
- Andrej Sali
In Materials Chemistry
- Ben M. Webb
- Andrej Sali
- Min-Yi Shen
- David Eramian
- Narayanan Eswar
- Ursula Pieper
- Mallur Srivatsan Madhusudhan
- Marc A. Martí-Renom
In Molecular Biology
- Ben M. Webb
- Andrej Sali
- Min-Yi Shen
- David Eramian
- Narayanan Eswar
- Ursula Pieper
- Mallur Srivatsan Madhusudhan
- Marc A. Martí-Renom
Citations in the corpus
- UCSF Chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: an Integrated Modeling System (2011, background): “…implements comparative modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints (Sali and Blundell, 1993) and can perform many additional tasks, including fold assignment, sequence-and structure-based alignments, de novo modeling of loops, and model assessment (Fiser and Sali, 2003; Fiser et al., 2000).”
- Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller (2006, methodology): “ModLoop ( http://salilab.org/modloop/ ; Fiser and Sali, 2003b) takes as input a protein structure and one or more residue ranges.”
- Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER (2016, methodology): “ModLoop (http://salilab.org/modloop/; Fiser and Sali, 2003b) takes as input a protein structure and one or more residue ranges.”
- Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER (2016, methodology): “ModLoop ( http://salilab.org/modloop/ ; Fiser and Sali, 2003b) takes as input a protein structure and one or more residue ranges.”
- Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER (2007, methodology): “Correspondingly, the average model accuracy increased from 43% to 54% (the model accuracy was measured as the percentage of the C α atoms of the model that were within 5 ◦ A of the corresponding C α atoms in the superimposed native structure).”