Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states
By D. Reiche, M. Bechberger. 2004
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9932eece8d6f81ec093b8d7b8de05a97d877605
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Patrik Söderholm
- R. Wiser
- S. Kucukali
- K. Barış
- Mohamed Shaaban
- J. Petinrin
- Reinhard Madlener
- Stefan Reichelstein
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
- Patrik Söderholm
- R. Wiser
- M. Bolinger
- Maria Pettersson
- Stuart J. Barnes
- S. Kucukali
- Kristina Ek
- K. Barış
Citations in the corpus
- Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective (2012, background): “Main instruments used in promoting renewable energy in the EU are: purchase guarantees by feed-in-tariffs, quota applications, and energy tax exemptions (Reiche and Bechberger, 2004).”
- Wind power development in Sweden: Global policies and local obstacles (2007, background): “countries in terms of both type and size; so does the public’s view towards wind power development and the legal possibilities to hinder wind mill installations at the local level [ 17 ].”
- Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States (2005, background): “L. Bird et al. / Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1397–14071398 planned for Denmark and Sweden) closely resemble the renewables portfolio standard (RPS) that has taken hold at the State level in the United States (Reiche and Bechberger, 2004).”
- Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development (2008, background): “Better understanding the strengths and weaknesses associated with various RET support approaches provides valuable lessons for improving those mechanisms (Menanteau et al., 2003; Reiche and Bechberger, 2004; Sawin, 2004).”