Evaluation of Female Mate Choice Cues in a Group of Lake Malawi Mbuna (Cichlidae)

By R. Jordan, K. Kellogg, F. Juanes, J. Stauffer. Copeia, 2003

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c984b7ce7218447f1d1318c9630b176417a83c2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. I. Barber
2. S. Gray

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Clara P. Amorim
2. A. C. Utne-Palm
3. B. B. Wong
4. I. Barber
5. M. Knight
6. S. Gray
7. A. Hendry
8. U. Candolin

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. U. Candolin
2. A. Hendry

Citations in the corpus

• Species differences in courtship acoustic signals among five Lake Malawi cichlid species (Pseudotropheus spp.) (2008, background): “Visual cues were found to be relevant for interspecific mate recognition (Knight & Turner, 1999; Jordan et al., 2003), but recent studies have pointed out that chemical (Plenderleith et al., 2005) and acoustic (Amorim et al., 2004) signals may also be important.”
• Differences in sounds made by courting males of three closely related Lake Malawi cichlid species (2004, result): “of Malawi cichlids, however, have failed to replicate this result ( Jordan et al., 2003; N.J.”
• Communication in troubled waters: responses of fish communication systems to changing environments (2011, background): “For example, mate selection in Lake Malawi rock-dwelling cichlids depends on visual (Jordan et al. 2003; Pauers et al. 2004; Kidd et al. 2006), chemical (Plenderleith et al. 2005), and acoustic (Amorim et al. 2008; Smith and van Staaden 2009) cues.”