A Meta-Analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Pesticide Risk Exposure

By R. J. Florax, C. Travisi, Peter Nijkamp. 2004

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c96dd0670e3f80bec63277eca1404e7766719ab6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Thomas Guillemaud
2. D. Bourguet

Citations in the corpus

• Incentives and policies for integrated pest management in Europe: a review (2014, unknown): “There is evidence that consumers are willing to pay more for reduced exposure to pesticide risk in general (Florax et al. 2005) and for organic products in particular (Torjusen et al. 2004).”
• The Hidden and External Costs of Pesticide Use (2016, background): “D E D. Bourguet and T. Guillemaud 47 given by respondents may be highly dependent on the way in which contextual information is presented (see Florax et al. 2005 ).”
• Determining water use efficiency for wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis (2016, unknown): “Multicollinearity among independent variables can be a problem for a meta-analysis with relatively small number of studies and many dummy variables (Florax et al., 2005).”