National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections

By R. Nadeau, Michael S. Lewis-Beck. Journal of Politics, 2001

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Election Forecasting: Principles and Practice (2005, background): “Work has shown that these specific additions do not add significantly to the models (Lewis-Beck and Tien 2002; Nadeau and Lewis-Beck 2001).”
Does Economics Still Matter? Econometrics and the Vote (2006, background): “In particular, a standard deviation change in NBI is expected to produce a 5.5 percentage point change in the incumbent party vote (Nadeau and Lewis-Beck 2001, 165).”
Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote (2011, background): “Markus (1988, 1992) was the first to build objective economic measures into a survey analysis; Nadeau and Lewis-Beck (2001) later added an aggregated subjective measure, which yielded a larger effect than the objective measure.”
Economics and Elections Revisited (2013, background): “…studies—most notably on France, the United Kingdom, the United States—have shown that economic perceptions at the macro level can correlate with macroeconomic indicators, such as growth or unemployment (Bélanger & Lewis-Beck, 2004; Kiewiet & Rivers, 1984; Nadeau & Lewis-Beck, 2001; Sanders, 2003).”