Letter to the Editor: Stability of Random Forest importance measures
By Malu Luz Calle, Víctor Urrea. 2011
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Francesca Dominici
- Aaron Fisher
- Cynthia Rudin
- Marvin N. Wright
- Despoina Makariou
- Anne-Laure Boulesteix
- Inke R. König
- Pauline Barrieu
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Garrett Kinnebrew
- Despoina Makariou
- Raghu Machiraju
- Anne-Laure Boulesteix
- Kyle Spencer
- Qin Ma
- Pauline Barrieu
- Tara Eicher
Citations in the corpus
- All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable’s Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously (2018, methodology): “This RF VI measure has been the topic of empirical studies (Archer and Kimes, 2008; Calle and Urrea, 2010; Wang et al., 2016), and several variations of the measure have been proposed (Strobl et al.”
- An experimental study of the intrinsic stability of random forest variable importance measures (2016, background): “In the research of Calle and Urrea, MDG is more robust than MDA to small perturbations of the data [22].”
- Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics (2012, background): “This may be related to the higher instability of the permutation VIM [13].”
- A random forest based approach for predicting spreads in the primary catastrophe bond market (2020, background): “As an example coming from the area of bioinformatics, Calle & Urrea (2010)) showed that permutation importance rankings were unstable to small perturbations of a gene data set related to the prognosis bladder cancer.”
- All Models are Wrong but many are Useful: Variable Importance for Black-Box, Proprietary, or Misspecified Prediction Models, using Model Class Reliance (2018, methodology): “This RF VI measure has been the topic of empirical studies (Archer and Kimes, 2008; Calle and Urrea, 2010; Wang et al., 2016), and several variations of the measure have been proposed (Strobl et al.”
- The revival of the Gini importance? (2018, background): “On the other hand, for high dimensional data, the permutation importance is very computationally intensive and Calle and Urrea (2011) showed that”
- Metabolomics and Multi-Omics Integration: A Survey of Computational Methods and Resources (2020, background): “Generally, metrics either evaluate the decrease in model fitness (e.g., Mean Decrease Accuracy [178] or Mean Decrease Gini [179,180]) when features are removed, or compare the influence of analytes on the model using the original values and shuffled values [181].”