III. Wanting and Not Wanting Sex: The Missing Discourse of Ambivalence

By Charlene L. Muehlenhard, Zoë D. Peterson. 2005

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c92884e19cb7cd65faf2072a812300c4d048f0e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Zoë D. Peterson
2. Sharon Lamb
3. K. Jozkowski
4. J. Wiersma
5. D. Tolman
6. Laina Y. Bay-Cheng

In Social Psychology

1. Sharon Lamb
2. K. Jozkowski
3. J. Wiersma
4. Zoë D. Peterson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sharon Lamb
2. K. Jozkowski
3. J. Wiersma
4. Zoë D. Peterson

Citations in the corpus

• Feminist Ideals for a Healthy Female Adolescent Sexuality: A Critique (2010, background): “She can not be passive, and must be an agent; she ought to know both how to consent and how to refuse sex; and perhaps more importantly, unambivalently know if she wants to consent or refuse (see Muelhlenhard and Peterson 2005 for their discussion on the missing discourse of ambivalence).”
• Does Drinking Alcohol Prior to Sexual Activity Influence College Students’ Consent? (2015, background): “…2006; Bogle, 2008; DeSantis, 2007; Muehlenhard, 1988; Muehlenhard, Friedman, & Thomas, 1985) or are ambivalent about engagement in sexual activity (Muehlenhard & Peterson, 2005), we anticipated men reporting higher scores on the ICS subscales indicating stronger feelings associated with consent…”
• Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Empowerment: Two Feminists Explore the Concept (2012, background): “That is to say, it is not always problematic for a girl to feel ambivalent about sex and sexual participation (Lamb 2002; Muehlenhard and Peterson 2005 ).”