TIME AND INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM GRAVITY
By K. Kuchař. 2011
740 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c923a8606137ec14dddcbaab4c32620606373f19
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Abhay Ashtekar
- Parampreet Singh
- Stefano Liberati
- M. Bojowald
- D. Harlow
- Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
- T. Jacobson
- D. Mattingly
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Abhay Ashtekar
- Parampreet Singh
- M. Bojowald
- Stefano Liberati
- D. Harlow
- T. Pawłowski
- Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
- Gianluca Calcagni
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Abhay Ashtekar
- Parampreet Singh
- M. Bojowald
- Stefano Liberati
- D. Harlow
- T. Pawłowski
- Carlo Rovelli
- Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
Citations in the corpus
- Constructing local bulk observables in interacting AdS/CFT (2011, background): “One might be surprised that such a construction could be carried out at all, since the diffeomorphism constraints of quantum gravity would seem to rule out the existence of local observables [1,2].”
- Quantum Time (2015, methodology): “This is true also for two-time correlation functions and propagators [6]; (iii) no dynamical variable can correlate monotonically with ‘Heraclitian’ time if the Hamiltonian is lower bounded; (iv) only time is appropriate for conditioning the state: for example, space may be inappropriate for setting”
- Quantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation (2006, background): “In particular, a major part of a conference proceedings [64] was devoted to it in the late eighties and several exhaustive reviews also appeared in the nineties (see in particular [65, 66]).”
- Threshold effects and Planck scale Lorentz violation: Combined constraints from high-energy astrophysics (2002, background): “Profound difficulties associated with the “problem of time” in quantum gravity [2, 3] have suggested that an underlying preferred time may be necessary to make sense of this physics.”
- Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems (2004, background): “For systems with one constraint such a differential equation for a complete observable appeared in [10].”
- Loop quantum gravity: an outside view (2005, background): “Although there has been much discussion in the literature about these ‘relational’ aspects (see [16, 30, 31, 34] and references therein, and [105, 106] for a more recent discussion in the context of LQG), these issues are by no means conclusively settled, and we are not aware of any fully concrete r”
- Loop Quantum Cosmology (2005, background): “There are interpretational issues of the wave function obtained as a solution to the constraints, and also the problem of time or observables emerges [143].”
- Membranes at Quantum Criticality (2008, neutral): “, [31, 32]).”
- Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints (2005, background): “Profound difficulties associated with the “problem of time” in quantum gravity [1,2] have suggested that an underlying preferred time may be necessary to make sense of this physics, and general arguments suggest radical departures from standard spacetime symmetries at the Planck scale [3].”
- The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (2013, background): “After this transformation, one would expect the constraints to be written as HA = PA + hA = 0, (A = 0, 1, 2, 3), where PA is the embedding momenta and hA is the gravitational energy density and energy flux carried by the true gravitational degrees of freedom [48].”
- Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point (2009, background): “In particular, various aspects of the “problem of time” [41,42] traditionally associated with the attempts to quantize general relativity are eliminated: The preferred foliation of spacetime leads to an invariant notion of time, susceptible only to time-dependent reparametrizations.”
- Observables in effective gravity (2005, background): “Kuchař [1] has argued that this suffers from a reductio ad absurdum; a counterargument has recently been proposed in [12].”
- Isotropic loop quantum cosmology (2002, methodology): “For this we need to write the constraint equation Ĥ|s〉 = 0 for a history |s〉 as an evolution equation which can only be done in a dreibein, rather than connection, representation since we are using a metrical expression as internal time [29, 13].”