Primordial non-Gaussianity: large-scale structure signature in the perturbative bias model

By P. Mcdonald. 2008

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

I compute the effect on the power spectrum of tracers of the large-scale mass-density field (e.g., galaxies) of primordial non-Gaussianity of the form {phi}={phi}+f{sub NL}({phi}{sup 2}- )+g{sub NL}{phi}{sup 3}+..., where {phi} is proportional to the initial potential fluctuations and {phi} is a Gaussian field, using beyond-linear-order perturbation theory. I find that the need to eliminate large higher-order corrections necessitates the addition of a new term to the bias model, proportional to {phi}, i.e., {delta}{sub g}=b{sub {delta}}{delta}+b{sub {phi}}f{sub NL}{phi}+..., with all the consequences this implies for clustering statistics, e.g., P{sub gg}(k)=b{sub {delta}}{sup 2}P{sub {delta}}{sub {delta}}(k)+2b{sub {delta}}b{sub {phi}}f{sub NL}P{sub {phi}}{sub {delta}}(k)+b{sub {phi}}{sup 2}f{sub NL}{sup 2}P{sub {phi}}{sub {phi}}(k)+.... This result is consistent with calculations based on a model for dark matter halo clustering, showing that the form is quite general, not requiring assumptions about peaks, or the formation or existence of halos. The halo model plays the same role it does in the usual bias picture, giving a prediction for b{sub {phi}} for galaxies known to sit in a certain type of halo. Previous projections for future constraints based on this effect have been very conservative--there is enough volume at z < or approx. 2 to measure f{sub NL} to {approx}{+-}1, with muchmore » more volume at higher z. As a prelude to the bias calculation, I point out that the beyond-linear (in {phi}) corrections to the power spectrum of mass-density perturbations are naively infinite, so it is dangerous to assume they are negligible; however, the infinite part can be removed by a renormalization of the fluctuation amplitude, with the residual k-dependent corrections negligible for models allowed by current constraints.« less

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9231f4cfbdb605d75ae5dbf3b90daabc3391e3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Uros Seljak
  2. M. Zaldarriaga
  3. V. Desjacques
  4. Volker Springel
  5. D. Baumann
  6. E. Komatsu
  7. M. White
  8. Andrey V. Kravtsov

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Uros Seljak
  2. V. Desjacques
  3. Oliver Hahn
  4. C. Porciani
  5. A. Pillepich
  6. E. Komatsu
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. Stefano Borgani

Citations in the corpus