Ecological Correlates of Extinction Proneness in Tropical Butterflies

By Lian Pin Koh, N. Sodhi, Barry W. Brook. 2004

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c922a9749d930df12ce3878cf480346e34c75614

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis (2007, background): “…habitat or niche specialisation, home range size, mobility, extent of geographic distribution, population density or rarity, edge sensitivity, body size and dietary specialisation (Johns & Skorupa, 1987; Brashares, 2003; Koh et al. , 2004; Cardillo et al. , 2005; Kotiaho et al. , 2005).”
How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency (2011, background): “There is also an extensive literature on the relationships between rarity, conservation status and the proneness of species to decline (Gaston, 1994; Koh et al., 2004; Lindenmayer and Fischer, 2006; O’Grady et al., 2004; reviewed by Gaston, 1994).”
The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Amazon (2007, background): “Conservation strategies rely on identifying species of conservation concern, yet many of the life-history traits that define species vulnerability (see Koh et al. 2004 ) are poorly known for Amazonian butterflies (Brown 1996).”
Theory meets reality: How habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory (2008, background): “Why? Many researchers have attempted to predict why certain species are especially extinction prone in insular habitats (e.g. Terborgh, 1974; Pimm et al., 1989; Laurance, 1991; Henle et al., 2004; Koh et al., 2004).”
Predicting susceptibility to future declines in the world's frogs (2008, unknown): “Using those traits highlighted in the analyses we may be able to direct conservation research and policy by predicting which species are most susceptible in the future (e.g., Cardillo et al. 2006; Koh et al. 2004).”
Recent trends in butterfly populations from north-east Spain and Andorra in the light of habitat and climate change (2011, result): “Aside from habitat preferences, other ecological correlates could also be influencing the direction of population trends, as has been shown by other Lepidopteran studies (e.g. Koh et al. 2004; Mattila et al. 2006; Pöyry et al. 2009).”
The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes (2013, background): “However, range size and larval specificity correlated consistently with rates of decline or extinction risk, mirroring studies on butterflies (Warren et al., 2001; Koh et al., 2004; Nilsson et al., 2008).”
Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. (2008, methodology): “Figure 3. An example of the synergistic feedbacks which threaten species in disturbed tropical rain forests [1,20, 28 ,55].”
Correlates of extinction proneness in tropical angiosperms (2008, background): “…(Sekercioglu et al., 2004) often suffer extinctions following habitat disturbance (Laurance, 1991; Castelletta et al., 2000; Koh & Sodhi, 2004; Koh et al., 2004b), and plants reliant on these extinct pollinators and seed dispersers would consequently be expected to have higher risks of…”