The potential to enhance membrane module design with 3D printing technology

By Jian-Yuan Lee, W. Tan, J. An, C. K. Chua, C. Tang, Anthony Gordon Fane, T. H. Chong. 2016

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c912104521d890cd8929c8553683a17eccd098a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. A. Nagalingam
2. Swee Hock Yeo
3. Jian-Yuan Lee
4. J. An
5. Kun Zhou
6. Wenjing Yang
7. C. K. Chua
8. D. Mattia

In Water Science and Technology

1. D. Mattia
2. Mathias Ulbricht
3. W. Jin
4. Gongpin Liu

Citations in the corpus

• 3D printing of CNT- and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling (2017, background): “Significant progress has been made in 3D printing aterials with functionality, such as electrochemical electrodes [4], hotochromatic materials [5], chromatographic devices [6], memrane modules [7], conductive composites and blends [8–14].”
• A review on the state-of-the-art of surface finishing processes and related ISO/ASTM standards for metal additive manufactured components (2020, methodology): “Currently, there are only limited test method standards for AM process, and the end-users are difficult to ensure that the quality of AM parts can meet their industry requirements (Lee, An, and Chua 2017; Lee et al. 2016).”
• Acoustic absorptions of multifunctional polymeric cellular structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by stereolithography (2020, methodology): “…applications through layer-by-layer buildup of pre-designed computer models (An et al. 2015; Zhuang et al. 2018; Yuan, Chua, and Zhou 2019a; Lee et al. 2016a; Ng, Chua, and Shen 2019; An, Chua, and Mironov 2016; Sing et al. 2015; Lee, An, and Chua 2017b, 2017a; Yuan et al. 2019b; Low et…”
• Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques (2017, methodology): “This screening is unique to this study since the methods were screened for membrane fabrication rather than for membrane spacers and modules (as per [18]) due to the higher demand in AM capability required for printing membranes.”
• Thinking the future of membranes: Perspectives for advanced and new membrane materials and manufacturing processes (2020, background): “[203]; for a first example of commercialization cf. section 6); - porous support for membranes, e.g. a 3D printed coarse porous support providing the otherwise conventional ultrafiltration membrane with a special undulated surface topography, which has a beneficial effect because of reduced fouling…”