Funding Extinction? Biological Needs and Political Realities in the Allocation of Resources to Endangered Species Recovery

By M. Restani, John M. Marzluff. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c90052bd7a617d8d4497d95e8f363ff1d38f2065

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Walters
2. John M. Marzluff
3. M. Kelly
4. Adam Dillon
5. S. Cooke

In Global and Planetary Change

1. John M. Marzluff

Citations in the corpus

• Status of the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) and Efforts to Achieve Its Recovery (2010, background): “…that from private partners (Restani and Marzluff 2001) likely reflects a general lack of political will to fund conservation (Miller et al. 2002, Restani and Marzluff 2002a), competition for scarce dollars throughout the Endangered Species Program and Refuge System, overregulation of USFWS…”
• The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis (2005, background): “Previous studies used single reports to determine whether funding (Miller et al. 2002, Restani and Marzluff 2002), recovery plans (Schultz and Gerber 2002), critical habitat (Clark et al. 2002), and multiple factors (Rachlinski 1997) were correlated with recovery trends.”