Critical psychology of acculturation: What do we study and how do we study it, when we investigate acculturation?

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hybrid and Alternating Identity Styles as Strategies for Managing Multicultural Identities (2018, background): “nuanced “thick description” of hybrid and alternating styles and their perceived consequences (Chirkov, 2009).”
Transnational Families and Social Technologies: Reassessing Immigration Psychology (2012, unknown): “Even if we accepted acculturation as a pattern that immigrants go through, the concept has little descriptive power (Chirkov 2009; Rudmin 2009).”
Travels in hyper-diversity: Multiculturalism and the contextual assessment of acculturation (2013, methodology): “…do not necessarily use Berry’s specific labels and measurement tools, they posit two key dimensions, measure them in a trait-like way using self-report measures, and use them to predict variables of interest—particularly psychosocial adjustment (Arends-Tóth & van de Vijver, 2006; Chirkov, 2009b).”
Dual identities and their recognition: minority group members' perspectives (2011, background): “In part this is because such questions require investigation of the contents associated with particular identities and questionnaires are limited in this regard (see Chirkov (2009) for criticisms of acculturation questionnaires).”