A successful 3D core-collapse supernova explosion model

By D. Vartanyan, Adam Burrows, David Radice, A. Skinner, Joshua C. Dolence. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper, we present the results of our three-dimensional, multi-group, multi-neutrino-species radiation/hydrodynamic simulation using the state-of-the-art code F{\sc{ornax}} of the terminal dynamics of the core of a non-rotating 16-M$_{\odot}$ stellar progenitor. The calculation incorporates redistribution by inelastic scattering, a correction for the effect of many-body interactions on the neutrino-nucleon scattering rates, approximate general relativity (including the effects of gravitational redshifts), velocity-dependent frequency advection, and an implementation of initial perturbations in the progenitor core. The model explodes within $\sim$100 milliseconds of bounce (near when the silicon-oxygen interface is accreted through the temporarily-stalled shock) and by the end of the simulation (here, $\sim$677 milliseconds after bounce) is accumulating explosion energy at a rate of $\sim$2.5$\times$10$^{50}$ ergs s$^{-1}$. The supernova explosion resembles an asymmetrical multi-plume structure, with one hemisphere predominating. The gravitational mass of the residual proto-neutron star at $\sim$677 milliseconds is $\sim$1.42 M$_{\odot}$. Even at the end of the simulation, explosion in most of the solid angle is accompanied by some accretion in an annular fraction at the wasp-like waist of the debris field. The ejecta electron fraction (Y$_e$) is distributed from $\sim$0.48 to $\sim$0.56, with most of the ejecta mass proton-rich. This may have implications for supernova nucleosynthesis, and could have a bearing on the p- and $\nu$p-processes and on the site of the first peak of the r-process. The ejecta spatial distributions of both Y$_e$ and mass density are predominantly in wide-angle plumes and large-scale structures, but are nevertheless quite patchy.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8fb6a45a002a3034d1f7867813c6d8eec672a21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Vartanyan
  2. Hiroki Nagakura
  3. Joshua C. Dolence
  4. David Radice
  5. M. A. Skinner
  6. Adam Burrows
  7. Christian D. Ott
  8. Hans-Thomas Janka

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. Vartanyan
  2. Hiroki Nagakura
  3. Joshua C. Dolence
  4. David Radice
  5. M. A. Skinner
  6. Adam Burrows
  7. Christian D. Ott
  8. Hans-Thomas Janka

Citations in the corpus