2007 Special Issue: The cerebellum as a liquid state machine

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation (2019, neutral): “…the computations required for these functions are achieved (Figure 2A; Braitenberg, 1961; Eccles et al., 1967; Marr, 1969; Albus, 1971; Fujita, 1982; Pellionisz and Llinas, 1982; Kanerva, 1988; Tyrrell and Willshaw, 1992; Miall et al., 1993; Ito, 2006; Yamazaki and Tanaka, 2007; Dean et al., 2010).”
State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks (2009, background): “Simulations reveal that, as a result of the feedback loop, a dynamically changing trajectory of active granule cells is created in response to a stimulu”
At the Edge of Chaos: How Cerebellar Granular Layer Network Dynamics Can Provide the Basis for Temporal Filters (2015, methodology): “While Yamazaki and Tanaka [15] argued that this chaotic network state is the preferred network state to implement an internal clock (compare Fig 2C with Fig 1 from [15]) these results show that it is disadvantageous when a filter of a continuous signal has to be implemented (see Discussion).”
Recent Advances in Physical Reservoir Computing: A Review (2018, background): “Another viewpoint from a model-based study is that the functional role of cerebellar circuits is interpreted as an LSM (Yamazaki & Tanaka, 2007).”