What do we know about the h index?
By Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007
708 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8ee814fa8027b2f8230d4654441df57aee73357
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- Ludo Waltman
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Nees Jan van Eck
- Francisco Herrera
- Anne-Wil Harzing
- Ron van der Wal
- Chaomei Chen
- Ming Tang
In Statistics and Probability
- Ludo Waltman
- Nees Jan van Eck
- Anne-Wil Harzing
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Ron van der Wal
- Francisco Herrera
- F. Cabrerizo
- Sergio Alonso
In Strategy and Management
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Sergio Alonso
- John S. Liu
- Xiao-Jun Zeng
- Ku Leuven
- Francisco Herrera
- F. Cabrerizo
- Lokman I. Meho
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007, background): “More complete citation counts can also help generate more accurate h-index scores for authors and journals (Bar-Ilan, 2006; Bornmann & Daniel, 2005, 2007; Cronin & Meho, 2006; Hirsch, 2005; Oppenheim, 2007) and journal impact factors (Garfield, 1996, 2006; Nisonger, 2004b; Saha, Saint, &…”
- An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2012, background): “The second data source is a collection of references from the following eight review articles: Alonso, Cabrerizo, Herrera-Viedma, and Herrera (2009), Bornmann and Daniel (2007, 2009), Egghe (2010), Norris and Oppenheim (2010); Panaretos and Malesios (2009), Thompson, Callen, and Nahata (2009), and…”
- Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019, neutral): “…paid to methodological issues such as appropriate methods for normalizing absolute citation counts (Waltman, van Eck, van Leeuwen, Visser, & van Raan, 2011b), in addition to development and examinations of new citation-based indicators such as the h-index (Bornmann & Daniel, 2007; Waltman, 2016).”
- A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018, background): “A researcher’s H-index means that he/she has at most H papers that were cited at least H times [31].”
- To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts (2008, background): “It has received immediate attention [2] [3] in the scientific community and has been critically evaluated [3] [4] and applied to various communities [5], as can be seen by the 72 citations that Hirsch's paper [1] has already accumulated within 2 years which is already more than sufficient to…”
- h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009, methodology): “In Bornmann and Daniel (2005, 2007a) the h-index is studied and used for post-doctoral research fellowships applicants evaluation.”
- Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices (2008, background): “Already published reviews on this topic include (Bornmann& Daniel [3]; Bornmann et al.”
- Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2008, background): “We further report the journal impact factor for 2006, the h-index, the g-index and the average number of citations per paper For each additional metric we also report how the journal ranks on this measure”
- The inconsistency of the h-index (2011, methodology): “For review papers of the h-index literature, we refer to Bornmann and Daniel (2007), Alonso, Cabrerizo, Herrera-Viedma, and Herrera (2009), Egghe (2010), and Norris and 3 However, Egghe (2006) considers the insensitivity of the h-index to highly cited publications a disadvantage.”
- An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship (2009, neutral): “The h-index (number of papers of an individual with citation count Ch) has gained considerable acceptance as a measure of individual research achievement that is advantageous compared to other bibliometric indicators such as total number of citations or number of papers published in journals of high”
- Reputation and impact in academic careers (2013, neutral): “[53] Bornmann L, Daniel H-J (2007) What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 1381–1385.”