Using ‘sport in the community schemes’ to tackle crime and drug use among young people: some policy issues and problems
By Andy Smith, I. Waddington. 2004
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This article seeks, first, to offer some critical comments on the policy issues and problems surrounding the use of sporting schemes as vehicles of social policy in which the intention is to reduce levels of crime, delinquency and drug ‘abuse’ among young people; second, to examine a point of fundamental importance in policy terms: do such schemes work? In this regard, it is claimed that relatively few of such schemes - which are largely premised upon a one-sided perception of sport - have built in processes for monitoring and evaluating their impact on levels of crime or drug use among young people. It is also argued that these methodological weaknesses are exacerbated by the absence of any clearly articulated theoretical rationale for these schemes, which means that, even where success for them is claimed, it is unclear what specific aspects of the schemes account for that claimed success.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8e45c469d1ac5a5427b1e6fd860539cb1cfa908
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Recreation or rehabilitation? Managing sport for development programs with prison populations (2015, background): “…aimed at decreasing antisocial behaviour and criminal activities (Coalter, 2007; Crabbe, 2000; Morris, Sallybanks, Willis, & Makkai, 2003; Nichols, 2004; Sandford, Armour, & Warmington, 2006; Smith & Waddington, 2004), little research has been done on sport programs within correctional facilities.”
- Sport in a youth prison: male young offenders' experiences of a sporting intervention (2014, background): “Concerns regarding methodological rigour and statistical reliability, as well as benefits gained versus programme costs, have resulted in some commentators questioning the likely impact of such schemes on recidivism (Smith and Waddington, 2004).”