One Instrument to Rule Them All: The Bias and Coverage of Just-ID IV

By Joshua D. Angrist, Michael J. Kolesar. Social Science Research Network, 2021

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We revisit the finite-sample behavior of single-variable just-identified instrumental variables (just-ID IV) estimators, arguing that in most microeconometric applications, the usual inference strategies are likely reliable. Three widely-cited applications are used to explain why this is so. We then consider pretesting strategies of the form $t_{1}>c$, where $t_{1}$ is the first-stage $t$-statistic, and the first-stage sign is given. Although pervasive in empirical practice, pretesting on the first-stage $F$-statistic exacerbates bias and distorts inference. We show, however, that median bias is both minimized and roughly halved by setting $c=0$, that is by screening on the sign of the \textit{estimated} first stage. This bias reduction is a free lunch: conventional confidence interval coverage is unchanged by screening on the estimated first-stage sign. To the extent that IV analysts sign-screen already, these results strengthen the case for a sanguine view of the finite-sample behavior of just-ID IV.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8dc03d2055f5f834c7be202bc748113459375b8