Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review

By Mercedes Eugenia Paoletti, Juan Mario Haut, Javier Plaza, Antonio J. Plaza. 2019

930 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Advances in computing technology have fostered the development of new and powerful deep learning (DL) techniques, which have demonstrated promising results in a wide range of applications. Particularly, DL methods have been successfully used to classify remotely sensed data collected by Earth Observation (EO) instruments. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a hot topic in remote sensing data analysis due to the vast amount of information comprised by this kind of images, which allows for a better characterization and exploitation of the Earth surface by combining rich spectral and spatial information. However, HSI poses major challenges for supervised classification methods due to the high dimensionality of the data and the limited availability of training samples. These issues, together with the high intraclass variability (and interclass similarity) –often present in HSI data– may hamper the effectiveness of classifiers. In order to solve these limitations, several DL-based architectures have been recently developed, exhibiting great potential in HSI data interpretation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current-state-of-the-art in DL for HSI classification, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the most widely used classifiers in the literature. For each discussed method, we provide quantitative results using several well-known and widely used HSI scenes, thus providing an exhaustive comparison of the discussed techniques. The paper concludes with some remarks and hints about future challenges in the application of DL techniques to HSI classification. The source codes of the methods discussed in this paper are available from: https://github.com/mhaut/hyperspectral_deeplearning_review .

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8cdd589603347088d61f64a4d845bf11dbb6804

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Antonio J. Plaza
  2. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  3. Jocelyn Chanussot
  4. Zebin Wu
  5. Guangrui Zhao
  6. Yuhui Zheng
  7. Danfeng Hong
  8. Bo Du

In Ecology

  1. Jocelyn Chanussot
  2. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  3. Jing Yao
  4. Danfeng Hong
  5. Lorenzo Bruzzone
  6. Antonio J. Plaza
  7. Bo Du
  8. Matteo Matteucci

In Media Technology

  1. Antonio J. Plaza
  2. Jocelyn Chanussot
  3. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  4. Danfeng Hong
  5. Bo Du
  6. Jing Yao
  7. Lorenzo Bruzzone
  8. Zebin Wu

Citations in the corpus