Geometric integration and its applications
By Chris J. Budd, Matthew D. Piggott. 2003
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8cb9ded9c80348a08b550dedd59bc335871d09b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
In Numerical Analysis
- Uri M. Ascher
- Robert I. McLachlan
- Robert D. Russell
- G. Quispel
- Chris J. Budd
- Weizhang Huang
- Sergio Blanes
- Fernando Casas
Citations in the corpus
- Splitting methods (2002, unknown): “…now clear that they are a very general and flexible way of constructing geometric integrators (McLachlan and Quispel 2001a, Budd and Iserles 1999, Budd and Piggott 2002, Hairer, Lubich and Wanner 2002) which preserve structural features of the flow of X, conferring qualitative superiority on the…”
- Numerical Methods for Evolutionary Differential Equations (2008, methodology): “The wave equation is also a Hamiltonian PDE [41, 38, 137] and can be seen to satisfy the local conservation law, [ 1 2 u(2)1 + 1 2 u(2)2 + V (φ) ]”
- Adaptivity with moving grids (2009, methodology): “Such methods are called scale-invariant (Budd and Piggott 2005, Baines et al. 2006) as they perform identically under the scaling transformations.”
- Geometric integrators for ODEs (2006, background): “More details on these topics and extensive references can be found in several recent books [47, 72, 109, 115] and survey articles [18, 19 , 36, 48, 61, 74, 76, 89, 90].”