In Defense of Minhash over Simhash

By Anshumali Shrivastava, Ping Li. 2014

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

MinHash and SimHash are the two widely adopted Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) algorithms for large-scale data processing applications. Deciding which LSH to use for a particular problem at hand is an important question, which has no clear answer in the existing literature. In this study, we provide a theoretical answer (validated by experiments) that MinHash virtually always outperforms SimHash when the data are binary, as common in practice such as search. The collision probability of MinHash is a function of resemblance similarity (R), while the collision probability of SimHash is a function of cosine similarity (S). To provide a common basis for comparison, we evaluate retrieval results in terms of S for both MinHash and SimHash. This evaluation is valid as we can prove that MinHash is a valid LSH with respect to S, by using a general inequality S 2

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Anshumali Shrivastava
  2. Ping Li
  3. Behnam Neyshabur
  4. Nati Srebro
  5. Sanjiv Kumar
  6. Yoshua Bengio
  7. Minjoon Seo
  8. Pascal Vincent

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ping Li
  2. Anshumali Shrivastava

Citations in the corpus