Stacks of group representations

By Paul Balmer. 2013

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We start with a small paradigm shift about group representations, namely the observation that restriction to a subgroup can be understood as an extension-of-scalars. We deduce that, given a group G, the derived and the stable categories of representations of a subgroup H can be constructed out of the corresponding category for G by a purely triangulated-categorical construction, analogous to etale extension in algebraic geometry. In the case of finite groups, we then use descent methods to investigate when modular representations of the subgroup H can be extended to G. We show that the presheaves of plain, derived and stable representations all form stacks on the category of finite G-sets (or the orbit category of G), with respect to a suitable Grothendieck topology that we call the sipp topology. When H contains a Sylow subgroup of G, we use sipp Cech cohomology to describe the kernel and the image of the homomorphism T (G)→ T (H), where T (−) denotes the group of endotrivial representations.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8c29279b3c684336c5fdaf094d1dfe5f96f2095

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

  1. A. Mathew
  2. J. Noel
  3. N. Axel Naumann

In Geometry and Topology

  1. N. Axel Naumann
  2. J. Noel
  3. A. Mathew
  4. Piotr Pstrągowski
  5. B. Bhatt
  6. Peter Scholze
  7. Lennart Meier
  8. M. Hill

In Mathematical Physics

  1. N. Axel Naumann
  2. J. Noel
  3. A. Mathew
  4. Piotr Pstrągowski
  5. B. Bhatt
  6. Peter Scholze
  7. Lennart Meier
  8. M. Hill

Citations in the corpus