Formation of isolated dwarf galaxies with feedback

By T. Sawala, C. Scannapieco, Umberto De Maio, Simon D. M. White. 2009

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results of high resolution hydrodynamical simulations of the formation and evolution of dwarf galaxies. Our simulations start from cosmological initial conditions at high redshift. They include metal-dependent cooling, star formation, feedback from type II and type Ia supernovae and UV background radiation, with physical recipes identical to those applied in a previous study of Milky Way type galaxies. We find that a combination of feedback and the cosmic UV background results in the formation of galaxies with properties similar to the Local Group dwarf spheroidals, and that their effect is strongly moderated by the depth of the gravitational potential. Taking this into account, our models naturally reproduce the observed luminosities and metallicities. The final objects have halo masses between 2.3 × 10 8 and 1.1 × 10 9 M� , mean velocity dispersions between 6.5 and 9.7 kms −1 , stellar masses ranging from 5 × 10 5 to 1.2 ×10 7 M� , median metallicities between [Fe/H] = 1:8 and 1:1, and half-light radii of the order of 200 to 300 pc, all comparable with Local Group dwarf spheroidals. Our simulations also indicate that the dwarf spheroidal galaxies observed today lie near a halo mass threshold around 10 9 M� , in agreement with stellar kinematic data, where supernova feedback not only suffices to completely expel the i nterstellar medium and leave the residual gas-free, but where the combination of feedback, UV radiation and self-shielding establishes a dichotomy of age distributions similar to that observed in the Milky Way and M31 satellites.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8b333cedd8c759e9c4676b5089407d3b43e4400

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. T. Naab
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Carlos S. Frenk
  7. James S. Bullock
  8. M. Boylan-Kolchin

In Instrumentation

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. T. Naab
  5. Carlos S. Frenk
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  8. M. Vogelsberger

Citations in the corpus